A fair question for anyone evaluating a semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME) startup is whether a credible path to liquidity actually exists, or whether the category is simply too narrow and too technical to produce real acquirers or public-market appetite. The data says the exit path is not just credible — it’s unusually well-traveled compared to the tech sector broadly, and Europe has produced some of its clearest examples. 

The category-level numbers 

According to Tracxn’s 2026 sector data, the semiconductor manufacturing equipment sector has recorded 116 acquisitions and 172 IPOs across its tracked company universe — a combined exit rate of roughly 12.1%, more than double the 4.7% exit rate Tracxn reports for technology companies generally. That’s a striking gap for a category often assumed to be a difficult, capital-intensive niche. SME’s narrowness is precisely what makes it exit-friendly: a small number of dominant strategic acquirers with both the balance sheet and the structural incentive to buy specialized capability rather than build it internally, combined with public markets that have repeatedly shown appetite for pure-play companies once they own a defensible, well-understood niche. 

A global proof point: Kokusai Electric 

Kokusai Electric, a Japanese deposition and thin-film equipment maker, offers one of the clearest recent illustrations of this dynamic outside Europe. KKR acquired the business from Hitachi Kokusai Electric for 2.2 B$ in 2017-2018 — a private-equity buyout of a specialized, narrowly-focused semiconductor tool maker most investors outside the industry had never heard of. Five years later, in October 2023, Kokusai listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange in Japan’s largest IPO in five years, raising roughly 724 M$. Shares jumped as much as 32% on debut, valuing the company at approximately 3.6 B$ — nearly 65% above KKR’s original purchase price. A specialized equipment maker serving a niche most generalist investors couldn’t name went from private-equity buyout to a multi-billion-dollar public listing inside five years, purely on the strength of owning a defensible process niche. 

Europe’s own version of this story 

Europe’s clearest example follows a similar storyline, and it’s now a decade into proving it wasn’t a one-off. VAT Group, a Swiss maker of high-end vacuum valves for semiconductor manufacturing, was taken public on the SIX Swiss Exchange in 2016 by its private-equity owners, Partners Group and Capvis, in an offering valued at up to roughly 635 M CHF. VAT wasn’t a broad, diversified industrial conglomerate — it was, and remains, a narrowly-focused specialist in one specific, mission-critical category of semiconductor process equipment. Nearly a decade later, VAT reported 942 M CHF in net sales and 212 M CHF in net profit for 2024, commands roughly 75% global market share in semiconductor vacuum valves and trades as a substantial, dividend-generating public company. That’s the trajectory a genuinely narrow, technically deep European SME specialist can follow, sustained over ten years of public-market scrutiny rather than a single favorable listing day. 

Europe has also produced a clean acquisition-path example in the same category. SPTS Technologies, a wafer-processing equipment maker headquartered in Newport, Wales, was acquired by Israel’s Orbotech in 2014 for 215 M£ — a UK-founded specialist bought outright by a larger strategic player in an adjacent part of the electronics manufacturing ecosystem. The story didn’t end there: Orbotech, with SPTS now inside it, was itself later acquired by KLA, one of the small handful of dominant global semiconductor equipment strategics. A specialist company that started in Wales ended up folded into one of the industry’s largest players through two successive rounds of strategic consolidation — exactly the kind of multi-stage exit pathway a narrowly-focused European SME company can realistically follow. 

Why strategics keep buying rather than building 

The buyer pool behind these deals isn’t very broad, but it is active and well-capitalized. Major SME (Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment) vendors, such as Applied Materials, Lam Research, KLA, Tokyo Electron and ASML, dominate the strategic acquirer landscape for specialized process technology, and their own economics make acquisition an attractive alternative to internal development: major equipment platform R&D in this industry runs three to five years and regularly exceeds 500 M$ per platform. In addition, major IDMs (Integrated Device Manufacturer) and foundries, such as TSML, Samsung and Intel, have a strong incentive to differentiate their business by securing access to novel technologies. Against that backdrop, acquiring a startup that has already proven out a narrow, differentiated capability is frequently the more capital-efficient path for a strategic than competing it internally from scratch — which is a structural reason this category keeps producing real M&A activity rather than relying on IPOs alone. 

Where this leaves a company like SisuSemi 

None of this guarantees any specific outcome — exit data describes a category’s tendencies, not any individual company’s future. But the pattern is consistent and well-documented across both routes: a narrow, defensible, technically deep SME specialist has a real, evidenced path to either a strategic acquisition by one of the industry’s small set of dominant buyers, or, with enough scale, a public listing that markets have shown genuine appetite for. SisuSemi sits in exactly the category — narrowly focused, technically deep, serving an industry whose acquirers and public markets have both demonstrated, repeatedly and recently, that they know how to value a specialist like this once it proves itself out. 

Contact us to learn more